Dermoscopic and Clinical Features of Pigmented Skin Lesions of the Genital Area (2024)

  • Journal List
  • An Bras Dermatol
  • v.90(2); Mar-Apr 2015
  • PMC4371665

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Dermoscopic and Clinical Features of Pigmented Skin Lesions of theGenital Area (1)

Instructions for authorsPrevious IssuesSubmit a manuscriptAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

An Bras Dermatol. 2015 Mar-Apr; 90(2): 178–183.

PMCID: PMC4371665

PMID: 25830986

Fatma Pelin Cengiz,1 Nazan Emiroglu,1 and Rainer Hofmann Wellenhof2

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dermoscopic features of vulvar melanosis lesions are well known. To ourknowledge, there are only a few case reports about dermoscopic features ofpigmented genital lesions in male patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate dermoscopic and clinical characteristics of benign lesions of thegenital area in both males and females, and to assess the distinguishingdermoscopic criteria of vulvar melanosis and atypical melanocytic nevi ofthe genital type.

METHODS

68 patients with pigmented genital lesions were included in thisobservational study (28 male and 40 female). A punch biopsy was taken fromall pigmented lesions and histopathological examination was performed on allspecimens.

RESULTS

We histopathologically diagnosed: genital melanosis in 40 lesions, atypicalmelanocytic nevi of the genital type in 15 lesions, melanocytic nevi in 9lesions, seborrheic keratosis in 4 lesions. The most frequent locations werethe glans penis (19 patients, 67.9%) in males and the labia minora (19patients, 47.5%) in females. The mean age of patients with atypical nevi(28,6 ± 11,36) was significantly lower than the mean age of patients withgenital melanosis (47,07 ± 15,33).

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel pattern is prominent in genital melanosis, ring-like pattern is onlyobserved in genital melanosis. Most pigmented lesions on the genital areaare solitary. Blue-white veil and irregular dots are only observed in AMNGT.According to these results, we propose that histopathological examination isperformed, especially if blue-white veil and irregular dots are found bydermoscopy.

Keywords: Dermoscopy, Melanosis, Nevus, pigmented

INTRODUCTION

Pigmented lesions of the genital region are uncommon. Its incidence accounts for10-12% of the population and for 20% of all vulvar diseases.1 The most frequent locations forpigmented genital lesions are the vulva in women and the glans penis in men. In theliterature, there are only a few case reports about dermoscopic features ofpigmented genital lesions in male patients. Pigmented skin lesions in the genitalarea include nevi, melanoma, melanotic macules (lentiginosis, melanosis),angiokeratomas, seborrheic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma(BCC).

Postmenopausal women are usually more affected by vulvar melanomas than premenopausalwomen. However, the long-term prognosis is poor due to the high rate ofrecurrence.2-6 Atypical melanocytic nevi of thegenital type (AMNGT) and vulvar melanomas usually affect postmenopausal women andthe prognosis is poor due to the high recurrence.2-6Histopathologically atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type (AMNGT) showsimilar features to vulvar melanoma. 7.8

Dermoscopy is a noninvasive tool that helps physicians distinguish melanomas fromother pigmented and non-pigmented skin lesions. It gives numerous clues about skinstructures in the epidermis, dermoepidermal junction, and dermis. Numerous methodshave been developed for the detection of lesion borders. Dermoscopic criteria havebeen described for the diagnosis of vulvar melanosis, and observational studies havebeen conducted to define the dermoscopic features of nevi and melanoma on thevulva.9-12

It may be difficult to clinically and dermatoscopically distinguish between vulvarmelanoma and vulvar melanosis. 11,13 To our knowledge, there have beenonly a few case reports about dermoscopic features of pigmented genital lesions inmale patients. 14,15,16,17

In this study, we aimed to describe dermoscopic patterns of pigmented lesions in maleand female patients, according to the patient´s age, and anatomical location andhistological subtype of the lesion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The photos and clinical data of 23 patients were obtained with permissions from theDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz. The study protocol wasapproved by the local ethics committee. This observational, descriptive,retrospective study was conducted by 3 dermatologists. 68 patients with pigmentedgenital lesions were included in the study. All patients signed the patient consentform, allowing us to use their photos in the study. Inclusion criteria were: olderthan 18 years of age, consultation in the department of dermatology due to apigmented lesion of the genital area. For all participants, sex, age, anddermoscopic patterns, location, diameter and histological subtype of the lesion wererecorded. Location on the vulva was divided into 3 categories: labium major, labiumminor and cl*tor*s. Location on the penis was divided into 3 categories: glanspenis, meatus and shaft of the penis. Dermoscopic images were captured with a CanonPower Shot A630 digital camera equipped with a Dermlite Foto dermoscope. Solitarylesions were excised for histopathological examination and a 4 mm punch biopsy wasperformed in lesions larger than 10 mm. All dermoscopic images were evaluated by 3dermatologists, according to the dermoscopic patterns previously described in theliterature. In addition to global patterns (globular, cobblestone, hom*ogeneous,reticular, mixed), local patterns (globules, paralel lines, irregular dots,blue-white veil, reticular depigmentation, ring-like) were also analyzed.9,10,12,18-21 Based onthe dermatopathological diagnosis, the 68 pigmented lesions were then classified asvulvar melanosis, melanocytic nevus, atypical nevus and seborrheic keratosis.

SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.) was used in the statistical analysis.Statistical significance was considered as p <0.05. Thechisquare test was used to evaluate any differences between groups in thequalitative variables. For correlations between variables, Spearman correlationcoefficients were estimated.

RESULTS

General Results

A total of 68 pigmented genital lesions from 68 patients were included (28 maleand 40 female) in the study. The mean age of the males was 40.67 ± 13.50 yearsand the mean age of the females was 38.25 ± 16.83. The 68 pigmented lesionsconsisted of: 40 melanosis (58.8%), 15 atypical nevi (22.1%), 9 melanocytic nevi(13.2%), and 4 seborrheic keratosis (5.9%), histopathologically (Table 1). The mean diameter of lesions was8.41 ± 4.60 mm. There was no statistical difference between males and femalesregarding the diameter of lesions (p= 0,112) (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Patients' Clinical Data and Skin Lesions

Clinical DataMelanosisAtypical NeviMelanocytic Nevi
FemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMale
Age
< 15 years------
16-30 years-3 (%14.3)6 (%50)---
31-45 years10(%52.6)12 (%57.1)6 (%50)-3 (%50)3 (%100)
> 46 years9(%47.4)6 (%28.6)-3(%100)3 (%50)
Clinical
Solitary6(%31.6)15 (%71.4)9 (%75)-3 (%50)3 (%100)
Multifocal13(%68.4)6 (%28.6)3 (%25)3(%100)3 (%50)-
Diameter
< 5 mm3(%15.8)6 (%28.6)9 (%75)-3 (%50)-
5- 10 mm10(%52.6)9(%42.9)3(%25)3(%100)3 (%50)-
10- 15 mm3(%15.8)3 (%14.3)--3 (%100)-
> 15 mm3(%15.8)3 (%14.3)----

Open in a separate window

The most frequent location for pigmented lesions in males was the glans penis (19patients, 67.9%), followed by the meatus (6 patients, 21.4%), and the shaft ofthe penis (3 patients, 10.7%). In females, the most common site was the labiaminora (19 patients, 47.5%), followed by the labia majora (18 patients, 45.0%),and both the labia majora and minora (3 patients, 7.5%).

Dermoscopic Patterns and Clinical Characteristics of Melanosis

The mean age for melanosis was 47.07 ± 15.33 years. 21 patients (52.5%) withmelanosis were male and 19 were female (47.5%). 21 lesions (52.5%) weresolitary, 19 (47.5%) were multifocal. Lesions consisted of 25 cases of melanosiswith two colors (62.5%), 12 cases of melanosis with one color (30%), and 3 casesof melanosis with three colors (7.5%). The mean diameter was 9.77 ± 5.13 mm. Themost common location in males was the glans penis (12 patients, 57.1%), followedby the meatus (6 patients, 28.5%) and the shaft of the penis (3 patients,14.2%). The labia minora was the most frequent site (13 patients, 68.4%) infemales. Melanosis on the labia majora, and both on the labia majora and minorawere observed in 3 patients (15.8%) each.

The most frequent pattern was the parallel pattern (21 patients, 52.5%). Theglobular pattern was present in 13 melanosis lesions (32.5%). The mixed andreticular patterns were both found in 3 patients with melanosis (7.5%). Thering-like pattern was present in 20 melanosis lesions (50%). We found theringlike pattern in 10 melanosis lesions located on the glans penis (50%), 3 onthe shaft of the penis (15%) and 7 on the labia minora (35%). The ring-likepattern was observed in 12 multifocal melanosis lesions (60%) and in 8 solitarymelanosis lesions (40%). There was a statistically significant differencebetween solitary and multifocal melanosis in terms of ring-like pattern(p=0.005) (Table 2) (Figures 1 and ​and22).

TABLE 2

Dermoscopic Features of Pigmented Lesions

Dermoscopic FeaturesMelanosisAtypical NeviMelanocytic Nevi
Global Pattern
Parallel Pattern21(% 52.5)--
Structureless Pattern-3 (% 20)3 (% 33.3)
Cobblestone Pattern--3 (% 33.3)
Globular Pattern13(% 32.5)6 (% 40)-
Reticular Pattern3(% 7.5)--
Mixed Pattern 3(% 7.5)6 (% 40)3 (% 33.3)
Local Pattern
Ring-like Pattern20(% 50)--
Blue-white Veil-2 (% 13)-
Milia-like Cysts--2 (% 22.2)
Irregular Dots-9 (% 60)-
Reticular Depigmentation---

Open in a separate window

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 1

Melanosis on the glans penis showing a globular pattern

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 2

Melanosis on the labia minora showing a parallel pattern (uniform linearand curved structures)

Dermoscopic Patterns and Clinical Characteristics of AtypicalNevi

The mean age for atypical nevi was 28.6 ± 11.36. 3 patients (20%) withatypical nevi were male and 12 were female (80%). 9 atypical nevi (60%) weresolitary and 6 were multifocal (40%). 9 atypical nevi (60%) had two colors,3 had one color (20%) and 3 (20%) had three colors. The mean diameter was5.20 ± 0.77 mm. All atypical nevi in males were observed on the glans penis(3 patients). In females, 6 of them were located on the labia minora and 6on the labia majora.

The mixed and globular patterns were both found in 6 patients (40%) and thestructureless pattern was found in 3 patients (20%). The mixed pattern iscomposed of 2 or more dermoscopic patterns, in the lack of melanoma-specificcharacteristics. The most common combination was that of the parallelpattern with linear and curvilinear brown streaks with the globular patternwith globules and dots. Irregular dots were observed in 9 patients (60%).The blue-white veil was present in 2 patients (13%). The ring-like patternwas not observed in atypical nevi (Figure3).

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 3

Atypical melanocytic nevus of the genital type. Irregular dots on theperiphery of the lesion

Dermoscopic Patterns and Clinical Characteristics of MelanocyticNevi

The mean age for melanocytic nevi was 39.33 ± 10.14. 3 patients (33.3%) withmelanocytic nevi were male and 6 were female (66.7%). 6 melanocytic nevi(66.7%) were solitary and 3 were multifocal (33.3%). 9 melanocytic nevi(100%) had 2 colors. The mean diameter was 8.33 ± 4.27 mm. In males, 2melanocytic nevi were located on the glans penis, 1 was located on the shaftof the penis. In females, 4 were located on the labia majora (66.6%) and 2on the labia minora (33.4%).

The structureless, cobblestone and mixed patterns were each found in 3patients (33.3%). The ringlike pattern was not observed in melanocytic nevi.Milia- like cysts were found in 2 melanocytic nevi (22.2%) (Figure 4).

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 4

Common melanocytic nevus on the labia majora showing a structurelesspattern

Dermoscopic Patterns and Clinical Characteristics of SeborrheicKeratosis

The mean age for seborrheic keratosis was 29.73 ± 8.35. All patients withseborrheic keratosis were female and all lesions were located on the labiamajora. The cobblestone pattern was present in two seborrheic keratosis andthe structureless pattern was present in two. Among the other nonmelanocyticlesions, comedo-like openings were found in 2 of 4 seborrheic keratosis.Milia- like cysts were present in one of them. The ring-like pattern was notobserved in seborrheic keratosis.

The mean age of patients with atypical nevi (28.6 ± 11.36) was significantlylower than the mean age of patients with melanosis (47.07 ± 15.33). The meandiameter of melanosis lesions (9.77 ± 5.13) was significantly larger thanthe mean diameter of atypical nevi lesions (5.20 ± 0.77) (p<0.001). Therewas a positive correlation between diameter of lesion and melanosis (p<0.005, r= 0.354). Additionally, there was a positive correlation between thenumber of colors and the female gender (p< 0.001, r= 0.461). There was anegative correlation between the presence of the ring-like pattern and thefemale gender (p< 0.001, r= -0.505).

DISCUSSION

Pigmented skin lesions of the vulva are present in 12-19% of the women who have hadgynecological examination.9 Vulvarmelanosis is the most frequent lesion among these pigmented disorders.22 Vulvar melanosis usually occurs inwhite women and has an unknown etiology. Even though vulvar melanosis has a benignprognosis, it causes concern to the patient and to the physician, owing to itsmelanoma-like presentation.11.13

Melanocytic nevi, whose dermoscopic features were first described by Rock B et al.,occur in approximately 2.3% of females.22 Atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type (AMNGT) mayhistopathologically mimic malignant melanoma by the presence of atypical cells(melanocytes with larger, pleomorphic nuclei, sometimes with prominentnucleoli).

In this study, we evaluated only benign lesions of the genital area, includinggenital melanosis, atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type (AMNGT),melanocytic nevi and seborrheic keratosis.

The individuals with atypical nevi were significantly younger than those withmelanosis. This result is consistent with those of previous studies.12 In addition to the solitarypresence of most genital melanosis lesions, atypical and melanocytic nevi were alsopresent as solitary lesions. About one fourth of the lesions observed in this studywere atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type (AMNGT), whose diagnosis wasconfirmed by histopathological examination. In our study, the number of AMNGT washigher than in previous studies. This result may be related to the highfemale-to-male ratio noticed in previous studies.7,8,11 In our study, the female-to-maleratio was lower than the one found in previous studies. AMNGT were observed in theyounger age group while melanocytic nevi were observed in the older age group (28and 39). Our results support the findings by Ferrari et al. In the analysis ofdermoscopic features of 16 vulvar melanocytic nevi, Ronger-Savle et al showed thatthe hom*ogeneous and globular pattern is the most frequent dermoscopicpattern.12 According tothe results from Ferrari et al., the globular pattern and the mixed pattern were themost common patterns in pigmented lesions of the vulva.11 In our case series, most AMNGT had a mixed orglobular pattern. These data are similar to those reported by Ferrari andcolleagues.

The mixed pattern, which is created by parallel lines together with hom*ogeneouspigmentation or globules, is more commonly present in atypical nevi than inmelanosis and melanocytic nevi. Ferrari et al. suggested that a pigmented lesionmust be followed up or excised if it has a mixed pattern.11 Our data supports this suggestion. Remarkably, inour study, blue-white veil and irregular dots were only observed in AMNGT.

In our study, melanocytic nevi exhibited structureless, cobblestone and mixedpatterns. Virgili et al showed that hom*ogeneous and globular patterns were commonlyseen in melanocytic nevi, in which a hom*ogeneous brown-gray pigmentation and shadesof brown, respectively, appeared.23 These data are similar to those reported by Virgili andcolleagues. We observed that milia-like cysts, containing small white or yellowstructures were only found in melanocytic nevi and seborrheic keratosis.

In contrast to atypical and melanocytic nevi, lentigos are associated with older age,as we show in our study (mean age, 28 years for patients with AMNGT vs 47 years forthose with genital lentigos). It is reported that lentigos (melanosis) are the mostcommon pigmented lesions among women, present in approximately 7% offemales.9,22 Vulvar melanoma is an uncommon tumor, with anincidence of 0.10/100.000 women annually and it accounts for 2-10% of all vulvarmalignancies.4 In theliterature, it was suggested that vulvar melanoma has a peak incidence after the 6thdecade.2,3 Ferrari et al reported the disappearence of 2melanocytic nevi in two young girls in a 4-year dermoscopic follow-up. Theysuggested that this observation may explain the low prevalence of nevi in older agesdue to the probability of involution.

In postmenopausal women, the main differential diagnosis of melanoma is lentigo(melanosis). Vulvar melanosis may occur as multifocal macules with irregular shape,which usually show all the criteria of ABCD rules. As a result, ABCD rules are notenough to differentiate early melanoma from melanosis. Mannone et al observed thestructureless pattern, which is histopathologically characterized by moderate toevident hyperpigmentation along the basal cell layer as the most common pattern invulvar melanosis in their series.9In a larger case series, globular-like and parallel, reticular-like,cobblestone-like and ring-like patterns, and their relation with multifocality werealso described in melanosis.10 Inour study, the most typical pattern of melanosis in genital localization is the'parallel pattern'. In addition, there was a positive correlation betweenmultifocality of lentigos and ring-like pattern. This result is consistent withFerrari et al. 10

To date, 17 cases of vulvar melanoma have been reported in the literature.11,19,23-27 In these cases, a multi-component pattern composedby blue-white veil, atypical network, irregular streaks, dots and atypical vesselswas exhibited. Ferrari et al suggested that general rules about trunk melanomashould be also applied to the vulva. According to the results of Ferrari et al andprevious series, none of the vulvar melanomas showed globular pattern. In addition,all the vulvar melanomas in their case series had 4 points or more when thealgorithm of Ronger- Savle et al was applied to the lesions.

It has also been reported that reticular depigmentation, a white network consistingof white, fragile lines, is a highly valuable dermoscopic finding in early vulvarmelanomas. 11,28 This dermoscopic feature had been associated withmelanoma and Spitz nevi.18,28 Reticular depigmentation was notobserved in our case series. Due to the benign histopathological results of ourcases, our data support previous findings.

Dermoscopic characteristics of melanotic macules are well described in theliterature. Uniform brown color (structureless or hom*ogeneous pattern), parallel(linear and curved streaks) pattern (the most common pattern in our study),ring-like pattern (multiple round to oval structures with well-defined regularborders) are the terms used to define mucosal melanosis by dermoscopy. In our study,we also observed globular and reticular patterns in melanosis lesions. Blue-whiteveil may be found in melanosis, even though this feature is more common in melanoma.9,10 As a result, vulvar pigmented lesionsdermoscopically exhibiting blue-white veil should be excised or biopsed to rule outmelanoma.

The limitation in our study were the low sample size and the inclusion of only benignlesions. The parallel pattern was the most frequent pattern in melanosis.Additionally, ring-like pattern was only observed in melanosis. Lesions had 2 ormore standardized dermoscopic colours in females. The ringlike pattern was morecommon in males than females. Most pigmented lesions on the genital area weresolitary lesions. Blue-white veil and irregular dots were only observed in AMNGTlesions. Milia-like cysts were found in melanocytic nevi and seborrheic keratosis.Even if there is currently no available information whether vulvar melanoma arisefrom AMNGT or not, it is better to remove lesions. Clues for AMNGT are given bydermoscopy.

CONCLUSION

In the literature, there are data on dermoscopic and clinical features of vulvarlesions. To our knowledge, our study is the first study that evaluated dermoscopicand clinical characteristics of both female and male patients. We aimed to determinespecific dermoscopic features of AMNGT and lesions which must be followed-up. It maybe difficult to distinguish between benign and malign lesions by dermoscopy, hence,all suspicious lesions must be removed. Further prospective studies of a largernumber of patients and genital pigmented lesions will give more definiteresults.

Footnotes

Conflict of interests: None.

Financial support: None.

How to cite this article: Cengiz FP, Emiroglu N, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Dermoscopicand Clinical Features of Pigmented Skin Lesions of the Genital Area. An BrasDermatol. 2015;90(2):178-83.

*Study conducted at the Kars State Hospital, Kutahya Tavsanli State Hospital, andMedical University of Graz - Graz, áustria.

References

1. Hosler GA, Moresi JM, Barrett TL. Naevi with site-related atypia: a review of melanocytic naeviwith atypical histological features based on anatomic site. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:889–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Irvin WP, Jr, Legallo RL, Stoler MH, Rice LW, Taylor PT, Jr, Andersen WA. Vulvar melanoma: a retrospective analysis and literaturereview. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:457–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Wechter ME, Gruber SB, Haefner HK, Lowe L, Schwartz JL, Reynolds KR, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a report of 20 cases and a review of theliterature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:554–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Lotem M, Anteby S, Peretz T, Ingber A, Avinoach I, Prus D. Mucosal melanoma of the female genital tract is a multifocaldisorder. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88:45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Ragnarsson-Olding BK. Primary malignant melanoma of the vulva - an aggressive tumor formodeling the genesis of non-UV light-associated melanomas. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:421–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. De Simone P, Silipo V, Buccini P, Mariani G, Marenda S, Eibenschutz L, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a report of 10 cases and a review of theliterature. Melanoma Res. 2008;18:127–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Gleason BC, Hirsch MS, Nucci MR, Schmidt BA, Zembowicz A, Mihm MC, Jr, et al. Atypical genital nevi: a clinicopathologic analysis of 56cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:51–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ribè A. Melanocytic lesions of the genital area with attention given toatypical genital nevi. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:24–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Mannone F, De Giorgi V, Cattaneo A, Massi D, De Magnis A, Carli P. Dermoscopic features of mucosal melanosis. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:1118–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Ferrari A, Buccini P, Covello R, De Simone P, Silipo V, Mariani G, et al. The ringlike pattern in vulvar melanosis: a new dermoscopic cluefor diagnosis. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:1030–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Ferrari A, Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Buccini P, De Simone P, Silipo V, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented lesions of the vulva: a retrospectivemorphological study. Dermatology. 2011;222:157–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Ronger-Savle S, Julien V, Duru G, Raudrant D, Dalle S, Thomas L. Features of pigmented vulval lesions ondermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:54–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Acikgöz G, Demirci CC, Arca E. Vulvanin Pigmente Lezyonlari. Turk J Dermatol. 2012;6:39–44. [Google Scholar]

14. Coras-Stepanek B, von Portatius A, Dyall-Smith D, Stolz W. Dermatoscopy of pigmented extra-mammary Paget disease simulatingmelanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:e144–e146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Ishioka P, Yamada S, Michalany NS, Hirata SH. Dermoscopy of Bowen's disease: pigmented variant on thepenis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87:482–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Betti R, Menni S, Crosti C. Melanoma of the glans penis. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:113–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. de Giorgi V, Massi D, Brunasso G, Salvini C, Mastrolorenzo A, Zuccati G, et al. Eruptive multiple blue nevi of the penis: a clinical dermoscopicpathologic case study. J Cutan Pathol. 2004;31:185–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensusmeeting via the internet. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:679–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. de Giorgi V, Massi D, Salvini C, Mannone F, Cattaneo A, Carli P. Thin melanoma of the vulva: a clinical, dermoscopic-pathologiccase study. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1046–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Chimenti S, Ruocco V. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. Eur J Dermatol. 2001;11:270–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, de Giorgi V, Piccolo D, Carli P, Delfino M, et al. Interactive Atlas on Dermoscopy. Milan: EDRA Medical Publishing and New Media; 2001. [Google Scholar]

22. Rock B, Hood AF, Rock JA. Prospective study of vulvar nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:104–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Virgili A, Zampino MR, Corazza M. Primary vulvar melanoma with satellite metastasis: dermoscopicfindings. Dermatology. 2004;208:145–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Lin J, Koga H, Takata M, Saida T. Dermoscopy of pigmented lesions on mucocutaneous junction andmucous membrane. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:1255–1261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Stolz W, Braun-Falco O, Bilek P, Landthaler M, Burgdorf WHC, Cognetta AB. Pigmented lesions on the mucosa. In: Stolz W, Braun- Falco O, Bilek P, Landthaler M, Burgdorf WHC, Cognetta AB, editors. Color Atlas of Dermoscopy. 2nd ed. Berlin: Blackwell Publishing; 2002. pp. 151–154. [Google Scholar]

26. Puig S, Malvehy J. Criterios dermatoscopicos de las lesiones pigmentadas en lasmucosas. In: Malvehy J, Puig S, editors. Principios de dermatoscopia. Barcelona: CEGE; 2009. pp. 321–332. [Google Scholar]

27. Wolf IH. Melanocytic nevi on the genitalia and other melanocytic nevi inother locations. In: Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Johr R, editors. Color Atlas of Melanocytic Lesions of the Skin. Berlin: Springer; 2007. pp. 119–123. [Google Scholar]

28. Lozzi GP, Piccolo D, Micantonio T, Altamura D, Peris K. Early melanomas dermoscopically characterized by reticulardepigmentation. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:808–809. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia

Dermoscopic and Clinical Features of Pigmented Skin Lesions of the
Genital Area (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arielle Torp

Last Updated:

Views: 6398

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arielle Torp

Birthday: 1997-09-20

Address: 87313 Erdman Vista, North Dustinborough, WA 37563

Phone: +97216742823598

Job: Central Technology Officer

Hobby: Taekwondo, Macrame, Foreign language learning, Kite flying, Cooking, Skiing, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Arielle Torp, I am a comfortable, kind, zealous, lovely, jolly, colorful, adventurous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.